[Committee] (no subject)

[Nicky Scordellis]

I've emailed asking for a place too.  We have the Jon Kohler event on
monday, so perhaps we could discuss our questions in a pub/bar after that -
either the Eagle or if it's too full (likely) then Kings or Queens' bar.  

Don't forget the BP event also tonight, refreshments are available (in
entrance area of Engineering dept) from 5.30 for a 6pm start so see some of
you there hopefully.
http://cocklebuttons.caret.cam.ac.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogc
ategory&id=45&Itemid=98  Have just noticed this says the talk is about the
promise of biosciences so possibly more technical than I had expected.  I
really have to go now but if anyone wants to email this our to the list then
please do.

Nicky


-----Original Message-----
From: committee-bounces at zerocarbonnow.org
[mailto:committee-bounces at zerocarbonnow.org] On Behalf Of P. Candela-Pokorna
Sent: 07 February 2007 14:48
To: A.L. Stephenson
Cc: F. Bottarelli-Bernasconi; committee at zerocarbonnow.org
Subject: Re: [Committee] (no subject)


Meeting on Monday for this sounds good to me. I sent an e-mail to book a 
place using the address you gave us. I'm waiting for a reply.

P

>Hey,
>
> There are lots of ways we can attack this talk. I am not sure which is
> best, so I suggest we each book seats, in case this is the tactic we 
> decide to take, and then get together and talk about how we are going to 
> do it. I would quite like to hear their rubbish so we can then pull them 
> apart. If we all have questions lined up before hand, we can dominate the 
> talk.
>
>Lets get together next week - say Monday, the day before the talk, and
>decide on our tactics.
>
>Anna
>
>On Feb 7 2007, F. Bottarelli-Bernasconi wrote:
>
>>I have a doubt:
>>
>> Exxon is giving a fraudulent talk which we are interested in 
>> boycotting
>> in some way (let's define it as a scientific-intellectual non-violent 
>> action); someone else thought that giving more space and visibility to 
>> these bastard would have been a good idea; so are we willing to pay 
>> these people in collusion? NO THANKS!
>>
>> I think we should simply break in after half an hour of speech or so,
>> when the people at the door have gone away. There is not going to be any 
>> security guard-police or anything like that, it makes no sense to pay 
>> them.
>>
>>There could be other options (like an insider who opens a side door, 
>>or
>>just try to attract the attention of the people at the door whilst other 
>>slink in). I refuse definetely to pay for it. Let me know what you think. 
>>bye F
>>
>>
>>On Feb 7 2007, A.L. Stephenson wrote:
>>
>>>Hey,
>>>
>>>If you want to go to the exxon talk at 1pm on 13th feb, email Oliver
>>>Crease:
>>>
>>>chairman at cues.org.uk
>>>
>>>Say that you want to pay the £2 non-member fee.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>Anna
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Committee mailing 
>>> list
>>> Committee at zerocarbonnow.org 
>>>
http://mail.zerocarbonnow.org/mailman/listinfo/committee_zerocarbonnow.org
>>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Committee mailing list
>Committee at zerocarbonnow.org 
>http://mail.zerocarbonnow.org/mailman/listinfo/committee_zerocarbonnow.
>org
>

_______________________________________________
Committee mailing list
Committee at zerocarbonnow.org
http://mail.zerocarbonnow.org/mailman/listinfo/committee_zerocarbonnow.org